ข้ามสารบัญไปยังเนื้อหา
อัปเดต 2026-09-07
Minor loss / K-factor & equivalent length
Crane TP-410 vs Hooper 2-K vs Darby 3-K
Compares fitting resistance coefficient K, equivalent length, and pressure drop by three side-by-side methods: Crane's single constant, Hooper's 2-K, and Darby's 3-K.
คำนวณอย่างไร
Crane TP-410 uses one Re/size-independent K per fitting from the project catalogue; Hooper (1981) and Darby (2001) add Reynolds-number and pipe-size corrections on top of the same catalogue ids.
สมการ
Hooper 2-K (Hooper, Chem. Eng. 1981)
D_in = nominal inside diameter in inches; K∞ = fully-turbulent coefficient
Darby 3-K (Darby, Chem. Eng. Fluid Mechanics, 2001, Table 7-3)
current best-practice size correction (0.3 exponent vs Hooper's 1.0); D_in in inches
Equivalent length & fitting ΔP
Darcy-basis L_eq (f = Darcy friction factor); ΔP from the summed K across the fitting set